<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Santa Clarita Valley Center for Photography &#187; Product Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scvphotocenter.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=product-review" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scvphotocenter.com</link>
	<description>(661) 904-2092</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 22:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=229</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Mamiya DF Camera and Mamiya DM56 Digital Back</title>
		<link>http://www.scvphotocenter.com/?p=584</link>
		<comments>http://www.scvphotocenter.com/?p=584#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mamiya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCV Center for Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scvphotocenter.com/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review by David Saffir, instructor with SCV Center for Photography Not too long ago I wrote a review of the Mamyia AFDIII and the Leaf 22MP back. At the time, I felt it was an excellent camera, and I still do. In this report, I’ll cover my recent experience with another Mamiya camera and digital [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p>Review by David Saffir, instructor with SCV Center for Photography</p>
<p><span>Not too long ago I  wrote a review of the Mamyia AFDIII and the Leaf 22MP back. At the time,  I felt it was an excellent camera, and I still do.</span></p>
<p><span>In this report, I’ll cover my recent experience  with another Mamiya camera and digital back: the Mamiya DF body, and the  Mamiya DM56 digital back. Since space is limited on the blog, I’ll hit  the high points as I see them.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Bottom line</strong>: a greatly improved,  highly flexible camera body that, coupled with this digital back,  delivers superb image quality. I have a few nitpicking suggestions, but  overall this camera is impressive.</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1909" style="width: 510px;"><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/mamiya_dm33_56_back-edit.jpg"><img title="Mamiya_DM33_56_back edit" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/mamiya_dm33_56_back-edit.jpg?w=500&amp;h=465" alt="" width="500" height="465" /></a></span><span>New Mamiya DF Body and Mamiya DM56</span></div>
<p><span><strong>Dan Cuny, of Mamiya/Mac Group,</strong> came to the <a href="../" target="_blank"><strong>SCV  Center for Photography in Santa Clarita</strong></a> and provided  camera gear for us to use. We started the day with a live demo for a  number of photographers from the local area, shooting still life.</span></p>
<p><span>The camera feels robust and well made. The  viewfinder is big and bright, and the in-viewfinder indicators are  easily read. We used two lenses: the 80mm f/2.8 lens supplied with the  camera, and a manual-focus 120mm macro lens. The camera is very well  balanced with either lens mounted.  I’ve found that I can work all day  without suffering undue fatigue.</span></p>
<p><span>The camera can be used with focal-plane, or leaf  shutter lenses. Highest sync speeds are reported up to 1/1600. The DF  camera body is compatible with existing 645AFD lenses.</span></p>
<p><span>The camera was equipped with a Mamiya DM56 digital  back. This back provides excellent resolution, 12 stops of dynamic  range, and true 16-bit capture. Color rendered by this back is terrific –  vibrant, very accurate, and totally clean.</span></p>
<p><span>The large, bright screen on the back makes it easy  to view images and manage the controls – although performance in direct  sunlight could still be improved.</span></p>
<p><span>Autofocus feels appreciably faster than previous  camera bodies, and reports from others who have tried this camera  confirm this.</span></p>
<p><span>We set up a Calumet shooting table, and several  monolights. We started out with high-key lighting, but switched later on  to a more dramatic approach. The shooting table is ideal for this work,  providing a smooth, clean translucent plexi surface that allows totally  flexible light placement.</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1952" style="width: 510px;"><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/img_6548group.jpg"><img title="IMG_6548group" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/img_6548group.jpg?w=500&amp;h=334" alt="" width="500" height="334" /></a></span><span>Setting Up At The SCV Center for Photography</span></div>
<p><span>We shot with the camera tethered to a Mac Book Pro,  using the provided 14-foot long Firewire 800 cable. Leaf Capture 11.3  was used to manage capture and image processing.</span></p>
<p><span>The Indian bowl we photographed (a personal  possession of mine) was initially shot using high-key lighting, with the  camera mounted on a tripod. We used a Sekonic hand-held meter to  measure exposure, and a PocketWizard Plus to trigger lighting from the  camera.</span></p>
<p><span>Note the clean contrast lines in the bowl:</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1953" style="width: 510px;"><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bowlfuill.jpg"><img title="bowlfuill" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bowlfuill.jpg?w=500&amp;h=349" alt="" width="500" height="349" /></a></span><span>High Key</span></div>
<p><span>And here’s a version with more directional  lighting:</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1958" style="width: 510px;"><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fullbowl.jpg"><img title="fullbowl" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fullbowl.jpg?w=500&amp;h=357" alt="" width="500" height="357" /></a></span><span>Note lack of shadow noise</span></div>
<p><span>Note how clean the shadows are; virtually no  luminance or color noise. We were using ISO 100, one step (albeit a  relatively small one) above base ISO of 80.</span></p>
<p><span>I was quite surprised by this; conventional wisdom  concerning high pixel density is that shadow noise will be significant –  but not in this case. I used virtually no noise reduction in the images  shown in this article – although I can’t say for sure that there isn’t  some processing going on in the guts of the digital back. Regardless,  performance exceeded expectations.</span></p>
<p><span>We also shot a still life of some sea shells. Note  the rendering of subtle colors, and in the second image, the sharpness  and detail. Impressive.</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1956" style="width: 510px;"><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/shellall.jpg"><img title="shellall" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/shellall.jpg?w=500&amp;h=442" alt="" width="500" height="442" /></a></span><span>Shot W/ Macro Lens</span></div>
<div id="attachment_1957" style="width: 510px;"><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/shellclose.jpg"><img title="shellclose" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/shellclose.jpg?w=500&amp;h=333" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></span><span>Shell Detail</span></div>
<p><span>Later in the testing, I had the opportunity to  photograph a model in a studio setting. I often use low-key, dramatic  lighting in my personal work. The lighting setup was created by a  friend, Ron Brewer – I tweaked it a bit, and this is the result:</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/portfull.jpg"><img title="portfull" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/portfull.jpg?w=500&amp;h=369" alt="" width="500" height="369" /></a></span></p>
<p><span>The highlight/shadow transitions are clean, and  free of noise. Also note the high level of detail around the eye  (below). These images are not retouched, other than a basic  levels/curves adjustment.</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1954" style="width: 510px;"><span><a href="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/eyeclose.jpg"><img title="eyeclose" src="http://davidsaffir.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/eyeclose.jpg?w=500&amp;h=385" alt="" width="500" height="385" /></a></span><span>Crop from full portrait</span></div>
<p><span><strong>The nitpicks?</strong> The thing that bugs  me the most is the location of the Auto exposure lock button – it is  placed toward the outer side of the camera grip – and I found myself  having to adjust my hold on the camera to reach it.</span></p>
<p><span>The digital back viewscreen, like just about every  one out there, is very difficult to see in bright light outdoors, much  less direct sun. It is, however, great in other circumstances. Don’t  know if this is a solvable problem; at least Hasselblad provides an LCD  view of the histogram on top of the camera grip.</span></p>
<p><span>And last, battery life, as with all MF digital  cameras I’ve used, is less than I’d like. I realize the battery has to  power the guts of the back, and the preview screen, but I’m still  blasting through several batteries a day outdoors. If Nikon and Canon  can make batteries that go a full day, why can’t the MF manufacturers?</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Last but not least:</strong></span></p>
<p><span>Say what you will about performance of high-end  DSLRs, there’s still a noticeable difference between 14-bit capture and  medium format 16-bit capture, in color fidelity and accuracy – and as  good as DSLR lenses are now, it’s still true that MF lenses are hard to  beat.</span></p>
<p><span>The flexibility of the camera is very good – given  the sync speed, choice of shutters/lenses, software (Phase One or Leaf),  and ergonomics. Whether you shoot weddings, studio, fashion, or  landscapes, it’s worth a look. I haven’t shown them in this article, but  the images I took on location are just as good as those provided here.  (by the way, outside temps were over 100F one day!)</span></p>
<p><span><strong>And a parting thought:</strong> this latest  Mamiya incarnation has a new feeling of sophistication and polish that  comes through<br />
every time I pick it up.<strong> It’s a shooter’s camera.</strong></span></p>
<p><span>——————————————————</span></p>
<p><span>Disclosure: I did not receive any compensation from  Mamiya or Mac group in exchange for writing this article.</span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scvphotocenter.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=584</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
